No ownership or control links for James Gray are resolved in the current sources yet — view the network graph to expand, or pull the cited JSON dossier.

What is James Gray's risk level?

WhiteIntel flags James Gray as low risk on 2 signals. Risk levels are heuristic investigative leads, not legal determinations of beneficial ownership.

Where does James Gray appear across sources?

James Gray is resolved across OpenOwnership, wikidata_pep, opensanctions_pep into one cited cluster in the WhiteIntel corporate-ownership graph, with a source on every claim.

LIVE · CORPUS

Coverage — measured

Sources fused: 1
Resolved records: 19

An absent edge means not yet observed — never does not exist.

PersonLow

James Gray

Name: James Gray — ownership dossier
Creator: WhiteIntel
License: https://whiteintel.dev/terms
Keywords: corporate ownership, beneficial ownership, UBO, corporate intelligence, OSINT, corporate registry, James Gray, Person, GB

James Gray — UK person (oo-person:GB-COH-PER-10662199-rLwYeg91HiMG1SQcdap1SN6CUkU). 2 sanctions/PEP signals. Cited to 1 registry.

3 sources

Ownership graph Export .md

JSON / MCPsample

Live UK registry

Politically exposed person

Politically exposed — member of the 58th Parliament of the United Kingdom: a screening signal for enhanced due diligence, not a finding of wrongdoing.

One real-world entity, resolved into a single cited record across 3 independent sources.

Investigative lead by resolved identity, not a legal determination.

/01

Registry identity

Appears in: 3 sources
Risk: Low
Jurisdiction: GB
Flags: PEP

/02

Politically exposed person

PEP

MediumPolitically Exposed Personvia resolved record

Position: member of the 58th Parliament of the United Kingdom
Country: GB
Category: gov.legislative, gov.national
In office: 2019-12-12 – 2024-05-30

Source list

A PEP designation calls for enhanced due diligence — it is an investigative lead, not an allegation of wrongdoing.

/03

Also appears in

OpenOwnership · wikidata_pep · opensanctions_pep

The same real-world entity, resolved across sources.

/04

Control & directorships

No ownership or control links resolved yet

An absent link means “not yet observed in our current sources”, not that none exists — cross-source resolution is still growing.

Watch this entity

We flag the moment ownership, a filing or a sanctions signal lands on it — the fastest way to catch a change on a subject we hold little on today.

United Kingdom coverage Report a lead Expand in the graph Live UK officer record

WHAT YOU CAN SEEFREE

YOURS NOW · FREE

4 items you can read right now — no account, no payment.

Identity, nationality & aliases
Sanctions, PEP & watchlist detail
Direct connections (1 hop)
Community notes

Nothing further on James Gray is behind a paywall — everything we hold on this subject is already on this page.

/05

Sanctions & PEP screening

Name match — unverified

2 watchlist records share this exact name. These are possible matches by name only — not confirmed as the same person. Verify identity (date of birth, nationality, ID) before relying on this.

/06

Common questions

Who owns James Gray?: No ownership or control links for James Gray are resolved in the current sources yet — view the network graph to expand, or pull the cited JSON dossier.
What is James Gray's risk level?: WhiteIntel flags James Gray as low risk on 2 signals. Risk levels are heuristic investigative leads, not legal determinations of beneficial ownership.
Where does James Gray appear across sources?: James Gray is resolved across OpenOwnership, wikidata_pep, opensanctions_pep into one cited cluster in the WhiteIntel corporate-ownership graph, with a source on every claim.

Community intel

Crowd leads · unverified

Tips, corrections and leads contributed by the community on James Gray. These are unverified leads, not WhiteIntel findings — we surface them for investigators to chase, and analyse the corroborated ones into SnitchScore.

Loading tips…