Skip to content
Home
LIVE · CORPUS
SnitchScore · reading…
evidence coverage · reading…
Coverage — measured
Resolved records
5

An absent edge means not yet observed — never does not exist.

PersonLow

Mark Field

Mark Field — UK person (psc:IkHNhRo2LYTIAsJRpgk7VhcA5JQ). 2 sanctions/PEP signals, 1 holding. Every claim linked to its source.

controls 1 company · 3 sources

Ownership graph Export .md
Politically exposed person

Politically exposed — member of the 57th Parliament of the United Kingdom: a screening signal for enhanced due diligence, not a finding of wrongdoing.

Controls or directs 1 company in the resolved graph.

Investigative lead by resolved identity, not a legal determination.

/01

Registry identity

Controls
1 company
Appears in
3 sources
Risk
Low
Jurisdiction
GB
Flags
PEP
/02

Politically exposed person

PEP
MediumPolitically Exposed Personvia resolved record
Position
member of the 57th Parliament of the United Kingdom
Country
GB
Category
gov.legislative, gov.national
In office
2017-06-08 – 2019-11-06
Source list

A PEP designation calls for enhanced due diligence — it is an investigative lead, not an allegation of wrongdoing.

/04

Control & directorships

Links are shown as observed in a source registry — we do not currently hold ownership end dates, so a link here may since have ended. Each row carries its source; check it before relying on currency.

Controlled by

None in current sources.

Directorships & controlled companies

Nothing further is withheld here. The ownership and control links above are everything we have resolved for Mark Field — there is no deeper chain behind a paywall. Absence means “not observed in our current sources” — it is not a finding of none.

Monitoring

Coverage of Mark Field is still thin in the current sources. Watch it and we'll flag the moment new ownership, filings or risk signals land.

Explore GB coverage
WHAT YOU CAN SEEFREE
YOURS NOW · FREE

4 items you can read right now — no account, no payment.

  • Identity, nationality & aliases
  • Sanctions, PEP & watchlist detail
  • Direct connections (1 hop)
  • Community notes

Nothing further on Mark Field is behind a paywall — everything we hold on this subject is already on this page.

/05

People & control

1 party · 0 current

Every officer, person with significant control and cross-company role we hold, resolved into one entry per party. Roles are registry records, not a claim of control.

1 party · 0 current. Ceased and resigned records are retained as history.

/06

Sanctions & PEP screening

Name match — unverified

2 watchlist records share this exact name. These are possible matches by name onlynot confirmed as the same person. Verify identity (date of birth, nationality, ID) before relying on this.

/07

Common questions

Who owns Mark Field?
No ownership or control links for Mark Field are resolved in the current sources yet — view the network graph to expand, or pull the cited JSON dossier.
What is Mark Field's risk level?
WhiteIntel flags Mark Field as low risk on 2 signals. Risk levels are heuristic investigative leads, not legal determinations of beneficial ownership.
Where does Mark Field appear across sources?
Mark Field is resolved across OpenOwnership, wikidata_pep, opensanctions_pep into one cited cluster in the WhiteIntel corporate-ownership graph, with a source on every claim.

Community intel

Crowd leads · unverified

Tips, corrections and leads contributed by the community on Mark Field. These are unverified leads, not WhiteIntel findings — we surface them for investigators to chase, and analyse the corroborated ones into SnitchScore.

Sign in to contribute a tip and earn reputation — it's free.
Loading tips…