---
title: "LOVE LIME STREET LIMITED — Ownership Dossier"
canonical: https://whiteintel.dev/entity/c4e710b7-d7ec-52a2-9285-c9a5ee5b0ade
json: https://whiteintel.dev/api/public/dossier/c4e710b7-d7ec-52a2-9285-c9a5ee5b0ade
identifier: oo:GB-COH-13404076
jurisdiction: GB
risk: Low
source: WhiteIntel corporate-ownership graph
---

# LOVE LIME STREET LIMITED

**Type:** Company  
**Jurisdiction:** GB  
**Identifier:** `oo:GB-COH-13404076`  
**Risk level:** Low  
**Canonical dossier:** https://whiteintel.dev/entity/c4e710b7-d7ec-52a2-9285-c9a5ee5b0ade  
**Structured JSON / MCP:** https://whiteintel.dev/api/public/dossier/c4e710b7-d7ec-52a2-9285-c9a5ee5b0ade  

## Ownership & control

### Owners / controllers

- **LOVE FOOD LOVES LIMITED** (beneficial owner) — 100% — https://whiteintel.dev/entity/ab924067-fd86-5d9b-a1ef-595c22484073
- **LOVE FOOD LOVES LIMITED** (beneficial owner) — 87.5% — https://whiteintel.dev/entity/ab924067-fd86-5d9b-a1ef-595c22484073

### UBO chain (walk to the ultimate owner)

1. **LOVE FOOD LOVES LIMITED** — beneficial owner 100% → *LOVE LIME STREET LIMITED*
1. **LOVE FOOD LOVES LIMITED** — beneficial owner 87.5% → *LOVE LIME STREET LIMITED*
2. **Mrs Natalia Amlot** — beneficial owner 50% → *LOVE FOOD LOVES LIMITED*
2. **Mr Dylan James Amlot** — beneficial owner 50% → *LOVE FOOD LOVES LIMITED*
2. **Mr Dylan James Amlot** — beneficial owner 37.5% → *LOVE FOOD LOVES LIMITED*
2. **Mrs Natalia Amlot** — beneficial owner 37.5% → *LOVE FOOD LOVES LIMITED*

## Provenance

- OpenOwnership — https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/13404076

---

_This is the markdown-for-agents view of the WhiteIntel dossier for **LOVE LIME STREET LIMITED**. Human view: https://whiteintel.dev/entity/c4e710b7-d7ec-52a2-9285-c9a5ee5b0ade · Structured JSON: https://whiteintel.dev/api/public/dossier/c4e710b7-d7ec-52a2-9285-c9a5ee5b0ade._

_Risk levels are heuristic investigative leads, not legal determinations of beneficial ownership. Every claim carries a source; an absent edge means "not yet observed in current sources", not "does not exist"._