---
title: "NAOMI V RUTLEDGE — Ownership Dossier"
canonical: https://whiteintel.dev/entity/2ea01cc0-7ad1-48c2-a4c8-94afe07f61ca
json: https://whiteintel.dev/api/public/dossier/2ea01cc0-7ad1-48c2-a4c8-94afe07f61ca
jurisdiction: US
risk: High
source: WhiteIntel corporate-ownership graph
---

# NAOMI V RUTLEDGE

**Type:** Person  
**Jurisdiction:** US  
**Risk level:** High  
**Canonical dossier:** https://whiteintel.dev/entity/2ea01cc0-7ad1-48c2-a4c8-94afe07f61ca  
**Structured JSON / MCP:** https://whiteintel.dev/api/public/dossier/2ea01cc0-7ad1-48c2-a4c8-94afe07f61ca  

## Risk signals

- **WANTED** (High): Criminal / wanted listing

## Provenance

- opensanctions_crime — https://www.opensanctions.org/entities/us-fed-excl-naomi-v-rutledge-85228-coolidge/

---

_This is the markdown-for-agents view of the WhiteIntel dossier for **NAOMI V RUTLEDGE**. Human view: https://whiteintel.dev/entity/2ea01cc0-7ad1-48c2-a4c8-94afe07f61ca · Structured JSON: https://whiteintel.dev/api/public/dossier/2ea01cc0-7ad1-48c2-a4c8-94afe07f61ca._

_Risk levels are heuristic investigative leads, not legal determinations of beneficial ownership. Every claim carries a source; an absent edge means "not yet observed in current sources", not "does not exist"._